Ofcom: Failing to communicate?

Yesterday I suggested that Ofcom were back-sliding on transparency — refusing to share with its stakeholder community what it told the Byron Review. And I mentioned that — if you want a laugh — look at how out-of-date Ofcom’s website is with respect to engagement with Parliament (it looks like the last update was in 2003!). Regardez:

_________________________________________________________________

Ofcom engagement with Parliament

Unsurprisingly, the results of this inactivity are reflected in Ofcom’s reputation. According to Ofcom’s own MP survey:

Ofcom MP Survey

* * *

It’s probably time for Ofcom — acting at the Board level — to engage in a top-to-bottom review of its document sharing policies, its website, and its overall commitment to transparency. Remember: This is the same regulator that lately has been telling everyone it has a unique vision of the new media future for broadcasting - the public service publisher (PSP).

How about a new media future for regulation? The public service regulator?

About OfcomWatch

Mission - OfcomWatch is an informal group blog commenting on the processes and practices of the Office of Communications (Ofcom) and related media and communications regulation issues both in the United Kingdom and around the world...

Our Sponsors

OfcomWatch Readers Poll

2008 - who will have the best year?
View Results

Activity

One comment, leave your comment or trackback.
  1. I agree and made a similar point at the recent Annual report event. We (NUJ) are still waiting for a response to our submission regarding the terms of reference for the review of PSB (three months and counting). Lots of consultations, precious little evidence of taking any of it on board.


Leave a Reply


Search

The archives run deep. Feel free to search older content using topic keywords.