Ofcom’s DTT consultation: ‘I shall call him Mini-DDR’

Mini MeMini MeMini MeMini Me

The consultation document — 128 page PDF — is here. My random observations:

– Overall, I’m confused by the complexity of the document. It’s mainly aimed at the industry — that’s clear. As a consumer, and not a very technical person, I was confused by most of the document. It’s hard to completely fault Ofcom in this respect because the subject matter is complicated, but still the regulator could have done a better job with some FAQs or a special ‘dummies’ section for people like me.

– Figure 5 (show people’s preferences for Digitial Dividend spectrum) appears to improperly to specify the mean of ordinal variables. I recall from statistics that such a measurement is flawed.

– Ofcom’s statements about HDTV are becoming more and more sanguine as the evidence mounts that it is the future of television. Recall in Dec 2006 Ofcom stated: ‘It is possible that [HD TV] will become the new standard for broadcasting – consumers may come to expect universal access to public service broadcasting in HD, just as they do now in colour. But the evidence for reaching a verdict on that claim now is lacking – most research suggests that HD is seen as a premium consumer product, rather than a significant source of value to society as a whole.’ I doubt Ofcom would make such a statement again…

– Section 7 of the document shows what a political battle this really is. It seems that the DCMS will have much say over what happens, with significant input from Ofcom. I wonder where regulated firms will direct their lobbying? Either way, the outcome looks somewhat certain: Continued state intervention at a very significant level in determining who does what and how.

– Ofcom propose a beauty contest to assign spectrum resulting from the new capacity. I thought the beauty contest was a relic of the old school? Ed Richards told Parliament in April 2007 — in the context of DDR — that the era of free spectrum was over. It seems inconsistent for Ofcom to take that position in the big DDR and abandon it in the mini-DDR.

– Ultra high speed broadband is really the future — not DTT. Here in the U.S. last night I was on the Xbox Live platform on a high def television. That is the future, folks, and it’s got music and HD television and movie downloads, tournament gaming, etc. It’s stunning in high def and you can easily see why these games consoles are overtaking Hollywood for younger people. This is why the work of the Broadband Stakeholders Group is so critical.

About OfcomWatch

Mission - OfcomWatch is an informal group blog commenting on the processes and practices of the Office of Communications (Ofcom) and related media and communications regulation issues both in the United Kingdom and around the world...

Our Sponsors

OfcomWatch Readers Poll

Next chair of Ofcom board?
View Results

Activity

One comment, leave your comment or trackback.
  1. Toby Williams
    Nov 23rd 2007

    Hi
    Quite agree with your last comment, broadband delivers a far more interactive and flexible capability than DTT. It seems incredibly blinkered to allocate further spectrum to an inflexible broadcast TV technology when we should be moving towards a market where customers and SP’s can choose how exactly the network is used, because the network is capable of supporting it all.
    Funnily, I misread your Ofcom quote about HDTV being a premium product and agreed… only to re-read it and find that their thinking was moving on… oh well. I happen to think that in the context of why we need and offer Univseral Service, great picture isn’t that important. Why not sustain a market where consumers can pay for better quality (as it is today), and allocate the spare capacity to more valuable uses, given the finite resource it represents?


Leave a Reply


Search

The archives run deep. Feel free to search older content using topic keywords.