By: Russ
Ofcom ASBO: Anti social baby order
Apparently Ofcom is receiving hundreds of complaints about Channel 4’s Bringing Up Baby. The programme features controversial baby-raising guidance and related experiments. Whatever…
We’ve written about this in the past (and made some videos: 1, 2, 3) — it’s often the case that people are able to waste Ofcom’s time with silly complaints. These complaints are silly in the sense that radio and television are probably filled with things people disagree with, but only a tiny minority of people feel entitled to have a public regulator spend its time and resources to issue an adjudication on the matter at hand. When it drafted the Communications Act 2003 it was clear that Parliament wanted to reduce the role of public regulation to adjudicate broadcast complaints as we entered the era of multichannel abundance. But some people don’t seem to have received that message.
Case in point: Some group — ‘Social Baby‘ — write on their website:
‘It is therefore of the utmost importance that complaints either make reference to, or clearly indicate which part of the [Ofcom Broadcast] code you feel has been broken. This will be key to the success or otherwise of any complaints.
There is a major problem with this. The Code makes no reference to infants or babies (that I can find), which I suspect leaves a loophole for programme makers and broadcasters to produce what they wish without regulation.’
Listen, if these geniuses think that the children in the programme are somehow being harmed, they can call the social services. Or if they think the guidance provided in the programmes is awful, they can make public rebuttals — or their own broadcast production.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, not a broadcast code adjudication…
Oct 8th 2007
I refer you to articles 1.26 and 1.27 of the broadcasting code
1.26 Due care must be taken over the physical and emotional welfare and the dignity of people under eighteen who take part or are otherwise involved in programmes. This is irrespective of any consent given by the participant or by a parent, guardian or other person over the age of eighteen in loco parentis.
1.27 People under eighteen must not be caused unnecessary distress or anxiety by their involvement in programmes or by the broadcast of those programmes
Oct 8th 2007
Amanda,
Thank you for your comment. But it still leaves me scratching my head:
What is Ofcom supposed to do now? Is Ofcom supposed to determine that one of the baby-raising theories is invalid and therefore Channel 4 did not take due care of the welfare of the children involved? I’m not sure there is anyone at Ofcom with that kind of expertise.
Disclaimer: I was raised on a steady diet of violent cartoons and junk foods.
Oct 8th 2007
No but i think ofcom has the duty to investigate the following
a) is there a significant evidence base to support the view that some of the practices shown in the programme are dangerous to very young babies?
b) was such information available to Channel 4 and/or silver river at the time of production